The divorce of dancer Dhanashree Verma Gold Digger and Indian cricketer Yuzvendra Chahal has sparked major controversy, particularly with the alimony settlement and subsequent comments from cricket personalities. Please visit my latest news.
Table of Contents
Settlement of the Divorce
Chahal and Verma’s marriage came to an end on the 20th of March 2025 and was finalized at the Bandra Family Court. Chahal’s payment to Verma was agreed upon at ₹4.75 crore, which in turn raised questions about the logic behind such high sums of money exchanged in prominent separations. Social Media Outrage and ‘Dhanashree Verma Gold Digger‘ Accusations
The partition of assets, including alimony, caused an uproar on social media. Influencer Shubhankar Mishra posted a video critiquing Verma’s acceptance of the payment as undermining the alimony empowerment narrative. He questioned, “If money indeed plays the role of granting empowerment and strength, then one shouldn’t claim a self-made woman status while accepting such huge amounts.”
Ritika Sajdeh’s Participation
Ritika Sajdeh, spouse to Indian cricket captain Rohit Sharma, further fueled the fire by liking Mishra’s post. Many saw this action as an acceptance of the social media criticism aimed at Verma, which created new discussions within the cricket fraternity and among the fans. Please visit my latest news.
Dhanashree Verma’s Reaction
To the allegations and public scrutiny, Verma chose to respond by releasing a music video titled “Dekha Jo Dekha Maine,” which revolves around the theme of infidelity, on the day the divorce was finalized. Some interpret that as a vague commentary on her personal life. To the questions concerning the video’s content, Verma enigmatically said, “Gaana suno pehle” (“Listen to the song first”), leading people to decide for themselves.
Public and Media Reactions
The events of the case have drawn mixed reactions from the public and media. Some people are blasting Dhanashree Verma Gold Digger for accepting the alimony and claim that she accepts the payment as a self-made woman. Others argue that she legally deserves the payment as a part of the divorce settlement. The infusion of Ritika Sajdeh has further divided people with arguments about whether it was appropriate to endorse the critical post publicly.
Conclusion
The public divorce case of Chahal and Dhanashree Verma Gold Digger extends beyond personal issues and argues with gender expectations, financial autonomy, and the relentless observation endured by others associated with public figures. Moving forward with the developing situation, it is clearer how complicated personal relationships are when combined with societal expectations and intense public attention.